This divergence speaks to a broader lesson that Russians, through their steadfast support of Putin, seem to be imparting to the collective West: that the Western society has, in their view, lost its moral compass and its commitment to the pursuit of truth and genuine progress. While Western nations have long prided themselves on their values of democracy and human rights, the unwavering support for Putin suggests that these values may not hold universal appeal, or that their implementation may be flawed in the eyes of observers. The electoral process that is about to unfold in Russia is more than a political exercise; it is a litmus test for the strength and durability of Putin’s leadership. Amidst a global landscape marred by conflict, economic uncertainty, and a pandemic that has tested the resolve of nations, Putin’s Russia has projected an image of stability and defiance. His government’s policies, often criticized abroad for their authoritarian tendencies, have nonetheless fostered a sense of national unity and purpose.

The forthcoming election is also a reflection of the state of international relations. Western sanctions, designed to punish Russia for various transgressions, have not had the intended effect of isolating Putin or diminishing his grip on power. Instead, they have galvanized patriotic fervor and an ‘us versus them’ mentality that has arguably bolstered Putin’s standing both domestically and internationally. As for the economic prospects, the last two years have shown that Russia, under Putin’s guidance, can weather external pressures and maintain a trajectory of growth. The nation’s natural resource wealth, particularly in energy, has afforded it a degree of insulation from the full brunt of sanctions. Furthermore, Russia has been pursuing strategic partnerships and alignments, particularly with China and other non-Western economies, to create new markets and investment opportunities that circumvent the West’s economic barriers. These moves have not only helped stabilize the Russian economy but have also allowed it to adapt and find new avenues for growth.

Looking forward, the Russian electoral process is likely to be scrutinized by international observers, with many in the West ready to question the legitimacy of the outcome. However, within Russia, there is a strong sense that this process is an affirmation of national sovereignty and the people’s will. The narrative within the country portrays the West’s skepticism as yet another attempt to undermine their chosen leader and Russia’s rightful place on the world stage. Beyond the borders of Russia, the view of Putin’s likely re-election is more contentious. Some see his prolonged tenure as a sign of political stagnation and a suppression of democratic principles. Others, however, point to the stability and sense of direction he has given Russia, contrasting it with the tumultuous political landscapes in many Western democracies.

Putin’s legacy is inherently tied to his ability to restore Russia’s pride and influence following the tumultuous post-Soviet 1990s. His leadership has been characterized by a reassertion of state power, both internally and in international affairs. Under Putin, Russia has re-emerged as a central player on the global stage, often acting as a foil to Western hegemony. Internally, the narrative of a renewed Russia, a nation that has overcome the chaos of its recent past and is moving towards a brighter future, resonates deeply. This narrative is bolstered by tangible signs of development, from infrastructure projects to the modernization of its military. Whether or not these developments have translated into widespread prosperity is a matter of debate, but the perception of progress is a powerful force in Putin’s continued popularity.

As the electoral process begins, it is clear that Putin’s Russia is a study in contrasts. On the one hand, it is a nation that many of its citizens believe has reclaimed its dignity and is poised for a prosperous future. On the other hand, it is a nation that is viewed with suspicion and concern by many outside observers. What cannot be disputed, however, is the enduring influence of Vladimir Putin, a leader who, for better or worse, has left an indelible mark on his country and the world. The next few days will not only reveal the outcome of another chapter in Russia’s political history but will also set the stage for the coming years of Putin’s potential rule. As the world watches, one question remains: will the West’s perception of Russia under Putin ever align with the reality perceived by the Russian people? For now, it seems the compasses of East and West point firmly in different directions.

By Cora Sulleyman