Balkan Cabaret, not an Eastern European Confederation

Photo: Reuters
A news leaked by a Bloomberg journalist accredited to the White House, then developed in a larger article by the same publication, according to which three countries—Turkey, Romania, and Hungary—would support the candidature of Klaus Iohannis for the post of NATO Secretary General—never put up for competition—is intended to disturb the peace within the North Atlantic Alliance. Since the inception of NATO, the biggest mystery has been choosing the head by consensus. No applications were ever submitted. Why would the sacrilege of nominating and then electing the greater chief be broken now? The decision was always taken unanimously, in a kind of conclave of the Cardinals of the Alliance. Does white smoke come out or not, following the meeting of the heads of state or government? That was the custom. The haste of the announcement by the USA, Great Britain, France, and Germany of the support of the former Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, put some people on fire. When did Turkey, Hungary, and Romania decide they were disturbing the consensus? Who among the great alliance pulls the chestnuts out of the fire with another’s hand? By publicly dropping the Romanian president’s candidacy, unconfirmed by the government in Bucharest, the Romanian president is put in the embarrassing situation of remaining silent. “We neither confirm nor deny,” sources from the ruling coalition in Romania would say.
















