Secondly, Trump’s protectionist policies indirectly influenced Australia’s election dynamics. The Coalition was criticized for its weak diplomacy towards the United States, failing to effectively counter the impact of the Trump administration’s tariffs on Australian steel and aluminum products. In contrast, the Labor Party skillfully positioned itself as a steadfast guardian of multilateralism, with Albanese emphasizing in his victory speech: “Australians have chosen to respond to global uncertainties with unity and pragmatism.”  

Finally, the opposition between the Labor Party and the Coalition on climate action helped the Labor Party gain support. The Labor Party pledged to reduce carbon emissions by 60% by 2035 and accelerate the transition to clean energy, while the Coalition advocated maintaining the dominance of fossil fuels. With the increasing frequency of extreme climate events in recent years, environmental issues became a central battleground in the Australian election for the first time, and the Labor Party’s climate agenda successfully attracted voters in urban and suburban areas. 

The Australian election has garnered widespread international response. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs extended congratulations to the Labor Party the day after the election, expressing willingness to work with Australia to advance the comprehensive strategic partnership steadily and sustainably. Professor Chen Hong, Director of the Australian Studies Center at East China Normal University, analyzed that the Labor Party’s re-election will help maintain continuity in China policy, and cooperation between the two sides in areas such as trade and climate is expected to deepen. 

However, challenges remain. The Albanese government needs to balance the U.S.-Australia alliance in the security domain while carefully managing differences with China on issues such as critical minerals and regional security. Although U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken congratulated Labor’s election victory, he emphasized “looking forward to deepening Indo-Pacific strategic cooperation,” signaling that diplomatic maneuvering with Australia will continue. 

From a positive perspective, first, the Labor Party’s majority government enjoys a stable position with relatively low policy uncertainty, facilitating European enterprises in formulating long-term investment plans. Second, Australia possesses resource advantages in critical minerals such as lithium and cobalt, while Europe leads in clean energy technologies and carbon capture. This creates opportunities for industrial chain collaboration between Australia and Europe. European companies can engage in joint R&D with Australia in fields like hydrogen energy and offshore wind power to jointly explore the Asia-Pacific market. Lastly, by participating in Australia’s critical mineral projects, European enterprises can reduce reliance on single supply sources and diversify their resource supply chains.

From a negative perspective, firstly, the Labor government may promote the localization of key industrial chains through subsidies, tax incentives, and other means. Consequently, European companies could face pressures such as technology transfer and local hiring requirements. Meanwhile, although the Labor Party attempts to balance its relations with China, fluctuations in China-Australia ties may still indirectly affect the confidence of European investors in Australia, amplifying geopolitical risks. Additionally, there exists the risk of U.S. interference. The United States may leverage mechanisms like AUKUS to pressure Australia into restricting cooperation with Europe in critical technology sectors. Lastly, with policy support, Australian domestic enterprises may rapidly rise, squeezing the market share of European companies.

As The Sydney Morning Herald stated: “On May 3, 2025, Australia did not just elect a government, but chose a way of life oriented towards the future.” The 2025 general election was not merely a referendum on Labor Party policies, but also a crucial confirmation of Australia’s strategic direction amid global transformations. 

By Yuli Zhang