A potential match made in GOP Heaven: Tucker Carlson could be Trump’s running mate for 2024!

Photo: Reuters
With the 2024 Republican primary approaching fast, Trump is looking to secure his spot as the party’s – once again – favorite. But, after being charged in early June with 37 federal counts related to retention of classified documents and conspiracy to obstruct justice, Trump’s success seems to not be guaranteed anymore. Unless, he can get an equally famous GOP figure to join him on the ticket as his VP. Names like Kari Lake, Nikki Haley and Sarah Huckabee Sanders have been mentioned by different news outlets as Trump’s potential VP picks. Trump knows he has a massive weakness with the white suburban women he would need to beat President Biden, so a woman VP would make sense, but if the GOP is serious about reclaiming the White House in 2024, the best possible ticket right now would be Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson as his running mate. In the past weekend there has been chatter about the possibility that Tucker Carlson might use his gigantic platform of followers to run for the 2024 elections. Therefore, Carlson could either be Trump’s greatest threat, or his winning ticket to the White House. And, as the saying goes, keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.
Why Tucker Carlson?
Known for his provocative commentary and conservative viewpoints, Carlson has gained both a loyal following and a fair share of criticism. Throughout his career, Tucker Carlson has faced considerable controversy and criticism due to his outspoken and often polarizing commentary. His remarks on sensitive topics such as immigration, race, and gender have drawn accusations of promoting conspiracy theories, spreading misinformation, and engaging in inflammatory rhetoric.
In 2018, Carlson faced backlash for suggesting that immigration was making America “dirtier.” His comments were condemned by many who viewed them as xenophobic and racist. Similarly, his discussions on gender-related issues, including transgender rights, have led to accusations of bigotry and insensitivity.
However, his critics argue that Carlson’s style of journalism blurs the line between news and opinion. They contend that his commentary often prioritizes entertainment value over factual accuracy, leading to the spread of misinformation and the further polarization of political discourse in the United States.
But, Tucker Carlson’s impact on American journalism cannot be ignored. His show, “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” provided a platform for conservative perspectives, attracting a significant viewership and influencing public opinion. Carlson’s ability to connect with his audience, coupled with his unapologetic approach, has solidified his position as a leading figure in conservative media. But, in April, Fox News Media announced that Carlson was leaving Fox News, where he had hosted Tucker Carlson Tonight since 2016. The show was a massive hit for the cable network and broke viewership rating records, and many of his fans have since posted on social media about their displeasure over his departure.
Tucker Carlson’s Controversial Departure from Fox News: Unraveling the Reasons
Following his departure from Fox News, Tucker Carlson launched his own show on Twitter. However, the initial episode appeared to be a low-budget version, lacking notable production value. Despite this, Fox News deemed the move a breach of contract, leading their attorneys to contact Carlson in early June. Carlson’s lawyers argued that his social media activity was a form of exercising free speech, questioning Fox News’ stance on freedom of expression.
The departure of Tucker Carlson from Fox News has been shrouded in mystery and speculation. While the exact reason for his exit remains undisclosed, allegations of misogyny and religious rhetoric have emerged as potential factors. A potential explanation for Carlson’s departure centers around a lawsuit filed by former producer Abby Grossberg, who accused Carlson and his producer, Justin Wells, of promoting rampant misogyny and anti-Semitism within the workplace. In a deposition related to the Dominion lawsuit, Carlson allegedly confirmed referring to Sidney Powell, a MAGA conspiracy theorist, using a derogatory term. Justin Wells, a prominent figure in Grossberg’s lawsuit, was also terminated alongside Carlson.
An intriguing theory behind Carlson’s departure revolves around his religious rhetoric and its effect on Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch. During the Heritage Foundation’s 50th Anniversary gala, Carlson blended nationalism, white supremacist conspiracy theories, and conservative Christian persecution paranoia, which reportedly made Murdoch uncomfortable.
In the aftermath of the Dominion lawsuit, court filings revealed Tucker Carlson’s sharp criticism of Fox News’ leadership. His comments, obtained by reporters, questioned the network’s credibility and trust with its audience. Carlson expressed frustration with what he perceived as a combination of incompetent liberals and prideful top leadership causing issues within the network. These critical remarks reportedly did not sit well with the higher-ups at Fox News, potentially influencing the decision to terminate his contract. The most important and damning texts are the ones in which Carlson revealed that he secretly loathed Donald Trump, and looked forward to a time when the network could simply ignore the former president.
The Trump-Carlson Dynamic
The notion of Tucker Carlson as a vice presidential candidate seems to be a very plauzible one. The close alignment of their political ideologies and the rapport they have displayed during interviews and appearances have further fueled speculation about a potential partnership.
Political observers and analysts have offered various viewpoints, with some suggesting that Carlson’s charisma, ability to connect with voters, and media presence could make him an appealing choice to complement Trump’s own communication style. However, it’s important to note that at this stage, such discussions remain speculative and lack any official confirmation or endorsement.
While the idea of Tucker Carlson as Trump’s VP captures attention, there is one important question to ask first: what if Tucker Carlson runs…against Trump? While no official indications or announcements have been made, the idea of Carlson entering the political arena has sparked debates and discussions.
Political strategist Rick Wilson outlined a fascinating scenario, suggesting that Carlson’s celebrity status could catapult him into the political spotlight. With his wealth and media presence, Carlson could establish a formidable online fundraising operation, rivaling even that of Donald Trump. Wilson posited that Carlson’s polarizing nature, combined with his controversial stances and love of authoritarianism, could resonate with the base and pose a significant challenge to Trump’s dominance.
Carlson’s celebrity status and communication skills could make him a potent contender against Trump. With his ability to frame complex issues in a simple narrative, Carlson could excel in debates and connect with voters. Additionally, as a political outsider, he could claim the insurgent mantle and attract small donor donations, potentially rivaling Trump’s fundraising prowess. While the notion of a Trump-Carlson clash energized opposition groups, skeptics questioned the viability of Carlson’s candidacy. Critics argued that Carlson’s talents were limited to reading provocative scripts off a teleprompter, while Trump possessed a natural ability to deliver fiery speeches without reliance on scripted content.
The possibility of Tucker Carlson embarking on a presidential campaign has ignited speculation and generated diverse reactions. His celebrity status, ability to engage with audiences, and potential appeal to the MAGA base have fueled the discussion. However, it is essential to remember that at this stage, the idea remains speculative, lacking official confirmation. The political landscape is known for its surprises, and until concrete developments occur, the potential match-up between Carlson and Trump remains an intriguing scenario within the realm of political conjecture.
By J. Costa