Scroll Top

Serbia Toward elections and EU

Serbia has recently experienced a political upheaval, with violent protests rocking the country and undermining President Vucic’s political credibility.
Serbia is a candidate for EU membership, but Belgrade must take a series of substantial steps in the remaining open and unresolved issues, such as European foreign policy, the rule of law, the conditions for free and fair elections, the judiciary, corruption, and the fight against organized crime. Above all, Belgrade’s international positioning must be reconsidered, especially in light of the ambitions of external super-players such as China and Russia.
According to Serbian law, Vučić cannot run for another presidential term, and many protesters and analysts expect him to assume the more powerful post of prime minister and cede the presidency to a loyal ally, following the pattern played out in Russia with the Putin-Medvedeev handover.
Meanwhile, the country’s institutions are demonstrating their unwillingness to distance themselves from the EU: the President of the Serbian National Assembly, Ana Brnabić, stated that Belgrade has supported Ukraine since the outbreak of the war and has provided Kiev with over €60 million in aid, in the form of direct financial and humanitarian aid, but not military aid. “We were the only country in the Western Balkans that, during the harshest winter months, supplied energy equipment to Ukraine, given the similarity of our electrical systems, as well as generators and spare parts. Even when such equipment was not available on the market, we supplied it from our reserves. In this way—and many are unaware of this, especially in the European Union—a very close relationship has developed between Serbia and Ukraine,” she explained in an interview with Euronews.
It was an opportunity to reaffirm Serbia’s path toward European Union accession, Brnabić, who in Brussels presented the results of Serbia’s reform efforts in the European integration process. He also quelled widespread rumors of excessive closeness to Moscow when he noted, “We Serbs are not Little Russians; Serbia is an autonomous, independent, and sovereign state with almost a thousand years of history. Yes, we have traditionally maintained good relations with the Russian Federation, and these relations continue to this day. But this is not a relationship without disagreements: I must emphasize that the Russian Federation has repeatedly criticized Serbia, for example, for voting at the United Nations to condemn Russian aggression against Ukraine, as well as for the assistance and support we provide to Ukraine.”
The EU Commission is calling on member states to open Cluster 3 of accession negotiations with Serbia in July, citing progress made in foreign policy, the rule of law, and electoral law reform. This initiative, however, is likely to encounter resistance from several countries. Serbia has not yet aligned itself with EU sanctions against Russia for its large-scale invasion of Ukraine, but the Commission emphasizes that Belgrade has cooperated with the bloc to counter sanctions evasion, provided significant support to Ukraine, and intensified political contacts at the highest level with Kyiv.

The document also acknowledges that Serbia’s work is far from complete, stating that “further work is still needed” on justice reform and the prosecutor’s system.
The assessment comes after Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić defended his country’s ties with Beijing during an official visit to China in May.
Regarding justice, the Commission states that Serbia has “remedied the setbacks” identified earlier this year and taken steps to strengthen the Organized Crime Prosecutor’s Office, while acknowledging that “further work is still needed” in the judiciary and prosecutor’s system.
The statement also cites the appointment of minority representatives to the Council of the Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, as well as amendments to four electoral laws, as evidence of further progress.
The Commission’s assessment, however, is unlikely to convince all member states, whose unanimous support is needed to open a new accession cluster. Several capitals remain skeptical that Serbia’s latest reforms are sufficient to allay broader concerns about democratic backsliding, judicial independence, and the rule of law.
Progress has also been made in relations between Serbia and the United States, thanks to increasingly intense cooperation in the economic, infrastructure, and security sectors, as evidenced by the assessment provided by the US chargé d’affaires in Serbia, Alexander Titolo.
According to BIRN revelations, Serbia has spent $3.2 million on lobbying in Washington since July 2023. Nearly half of this money was spent in the twelve months following Donald Trump’s return to the White House.
Belgrade is currently paying three US lobbying firms, two of which are run by former Trump advisers: Valcour, led by Matt Mowers, White House counsel at the US State Department during Trump’s first presidency, and BGR Governmental Affairs, led by David Urban, Trump’s adviser during the 2016 presidential campaign.
According to data published by the US organization Open Secrets, BGR Governmental Affairs is one of the four lobbying firms that have seen the largest increases in revenue since the start of Trump’s second term, with a 59% increase between 2024 and 2025, reaching $71.5 million.
The Belgrade government hired the Valcour company last year specifically to promote EXPO 2027, the major trade fair to be held in Belgrade.
After Trump’s return to the White House, Serbia changed its strategy: instead of lobbying organizations like Freedom House and mainstream US media, it now seeks more direct contact with US administration officials and right-wing media.
In this context, Serbia appears much closer to the Atlantic Pact than to other factions.
The question is: will Serbia have political stability after its recent internal problems?
By Domenico Greco

Related Posts