Scroll Top

Who wants to kill the Georgian Dream?

You can rarely see a country so frustrated by foreign interventions in state policy as Georgia. In Tbilisi there is more talk of external danger than of economic problems and the standard of living of the population, which overwhelmingly chose the Georgian Dream party, accused by the mainstream media of too close relations with Putin. Pro-Russians accuse Western interventionism. Georgians represent—let’s not forget!—one of the oldest peoples in the world, closely related to Armenians. Georgians have a very reflective proverb: A bitter word of your friend is honey with butter; a sweet word of your enemy is poison. The law on transparency of funding of non-governmental organizations—gordian node—was promulgated by some European democracies, such as Hungary, and not by Russia.

After taking his hump in the Middle East, America preferred to immerse itself in the boiling basin of Caucasian politics, through grasshopper defenders, the so-called civil society, and the full eyes of intelligence agents, to influence state decisions. In the meantime of the failure of the Rose Revolution, the West was defeated by the new way of doing domestic and foreign policy with talent. Because it failed to vassalize it, Russia caused ethnic crises in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, culminating in military intervention after Putin failed in his relationship with NATO at the 2008 summit in Bucharest.
History is obvious. Nothing jumped out of the reeds, like egrets.
The former foreign minister of the late USSR, who became president of this state released from the Soviet web, Eduard Shevardnadze, found himself with a huge mass protest after he passed the law on state powers, which replaced the constitution. This was in 2003, through what is known as the Rose Revolution. The foreign forces, which orchestrated the first radical youth protests after the Belgrade maid, organized by CIA agents, in the year 2000, radicalized Georgian youth against their former friend, Silver Fox, Shevardnadze’s nickname.
Parliament elected its president as head of state. The speaker of parliament was at the same time in charge of the legislative and executive power and had the right to appoint or dismiss judges, the attorney general, and ministers (article 17), and this caused a merger of power. In fact, and in law, a model of the American republic, gender. External Democrats signaled to Shevardnadze that the law on state powers was undemocratic and failed to act as a mechanism of control and balance for the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. Isn’t that right? „Your friend is your mirror,’ as a Georgian trueborn says?
In fact, just like in Romania, Westerners wanted to control power through the mechanisms of justice. And it didn’t work out. Then they launched the strongest demonstrations of young people. It’s been a year since the last election. Protests continued. Georgia is facing the potential destruction of its strategic partnerships, which have lasted for more than 30 years, with the United States and the European Union—a geopolitical course that has been the backbone of its statehood since it regained independence from the Soviet Union, Western media say.
Is that true?
A huge propaganda mechanism of the EU and the US arose in 2008 against the states of the Southern Caucasus. After Aliyev sweetened with the West, pressure dropped in Azerbaijan but intensified in Georgia. As for the crisis in Armenia, in a later comment.
By Marius Ghilezan

Related Posts